 |
 |
 |
 | Velocity-independent
-
moveout
in a horizontally-layered VTI medium |  |
![[pdf]](icons/pdf.png) |
Next: Flattening by predictive painting
Up: Estimation of interval parameters
Previous: Stripping equations
The second alternative to get VTI interval parameters comes from
the integral formulation of the
-
moveout signature in
equation 7. The derivation is detailed in Appendix C. We first compute
and
then, applying the chain rule,
. Solving for
and
, we arrive at the following relations:
which are equivalent to those proposed previously by
Fowler et al. (2008). According to equations 27 and 28, the
gradients of offset
and the zero-slope time
measured at
common slope locations
on two consecutive seismic event return
the VTI interval parameters for the layer bounded by these two events
(Figure 1a). Fowler et al. (2008) first pick traveltime curves in
-
domain, and then differentiate those curves in offset to compute
slopes
. Finally, for any given
value on each seismic event,
they determine the corresponding
and
values
(Figure 1a). The main practical limitation in this
inversion scheme is the difficulty of picking seismic events
accurately.
The processing becomes easier if it is accomplished in
-
with
automatic slope estimation. First,
-
transform unveils the
position of equal slope events. Second,
and
are measured automatically (without event picking) on the
-
transformed CMP gather. The quantity
can be
estimated as the
finite difference of
values
computed according to velocity-independent moveout equation
15. The zero-slope time
function is still
needed to map the interval parameter estimated using equations 27
and 28 to the correct vertical time (Table
1).
 |
 |
 |
 | Velocity-independent
-
moveout
in a horizontally-layered VTI medium |  |
![[pdf]](icons/pdf.png) |
Next: Flattening by predictive painting
Up: Estimation of interval parameters
Previous: Stripping equations
2011-06-25