![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | Noncausal ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Seismic noise attenuation is very important for seismic data processing and
interpretation, especially for 3D seismic data. Among the methods of seismic
noise attenuation, prediction filtering is one of the most effective and most
commonly used methods, e.g., (Galbraith, 1984; Sacchi and Kuehl, 2001; Gulunay, 1986; Gulunay et al., 1993). Prediction filtering can be implemented in
-
domain or
domain (Hornbostel, 1991; Abma and Claerbout, 1995). Abma and Claerbout (1995)
compared
-
method and
method and gave the advantages
and disadvantages of both these methods. The proposed method in our paper
belongs to the category of
-
domain methods. The
-
prediction technique
was introduced for random noise attenuation on 2D poststack data by Canales (1984)
and further developed by Gulunay (1986). Wang and West (1991) and
Hornbostel (1991) used noncausal filters for random noise attenuation on
stacked seismic data and obtain a good result. Linear prediction filtering
states that the signal can be described by an autoregressive (AR) model,
which means that a superposition of linear events transforms into a
superposition of complex sinusoids in the
-
domain. Sacchi and Kuehl (2001)
utilized the autoregressive-moving average (ARMA) structure of
the signal to estimate a prediction error filter (PEF) and applied ARMA
model to attenuate random noise. Liu et al. (2009) applied ARMA-based
noncausal spatial prediction filtering to avoid the model inconsistency.
As already noted, these above mentioned
-
methods assume seismic section
is composed of a finite number of linear events with constant dip in
domain. To cope with the assumption continuous changes dips, short temporal
and spatial analysis windows are usually used in
-
prediction filtering.
Except using windowing strategy, several nonstationary prediction filters
are proposed and used in seismic noise attenuation and interpolation.
Naghizadeh and Sacchi (2009) proposed an adaptive
-
prediction filter,
which was used to interpolate waveforms that have spatially variant dips.
Fomel (2009) developed a general method of regularized nonstationary
aoturegression (RNA) with shaping regularization (Fomel, 2007) for
time domain inverse problems. Liu et al. (1991) propose a method for
random noise attenuation in seismic data by applying noncausal
regularized nonstationary autoregression (NRNA) in frequency domain,
which is implemented for 2D seismic data. These nonstationary methods
can control algorithm’s adaptability to changes in local dip so that
they can process curved events.
If using
-
prediction filter to suppress random noise on 3D seismic
data, one need to run the 2D algorithm slice by slice (along inline x or
crossline y). To use more information to predict the effective signal
in 3D data, several geophysicists extended
-
prediction filtering to
3D case. Chase (1992) designs and applies 2-D prediction filters in the
plane defined by the inline and crossline directions for each temporal
frequency slice of the 3-D data volume. Ozdemir et al. (1999) applied
f-x-y projection filtering to attenuate random noise of seismic data
with low poor signal to noise ratio (SNR), in which the crucial step
of 2-D spectral factorization is achieved through the causal helical
filter. Gulunay (2000) proposed using full-plane noncausal prediction
filters to process each frequency slice of the 3-D data. Wang (2002)
applied
-
-
3D prediction filter to implement seismic data interpolation
and gave a good result. Hodgson et al. (2002) presented a novel method of
noise attenuation for 3D seismic data, which applies a smoothing filter
to each targeted frequency slice and allows targeted filtering of selected
parts of the frequency spectrum.
In this paper, we extend
-
NRNA method (Liu et al., 1991) to
-
-
case
and use
-
-
NRNA to attenuate random noise for 3D seismic data. The
coefficients of 3D NRNA method are smooth along two space coordinates
(x and y) in
-
-
domain. This paper is organized as follows: First,
we provide the theory for random noise on 3D seismic data, paying
particular attention to establishment of
-
-
NRNA equations with
constraints and implementation of it with shaping regularization.
Then we evaluate and compare the proposed method with
-
NRNA using
synthetic and real data examples and discuss the parameter selection
problem associated with our algorithm.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | Noncausal ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |