|
|
|
| Signal and noise separation in prestack seismic data using velocity-dependent seislet transform | |
|
Next: Bibliography
Up: Liu et al.: VD-seislet
Previous: Acknowledgments
The lifting scheme (Sweldens, 1995) provides a convenient approach
for defining wavelet transforms by breaking them down into the
following steps:
- Divide data into even and odd components, and
.
- Find a residual difference, , between the odd
component and its prediction from the even component:
|
(20) |
where is a prediction operator.
- Find a coarse approximation, , of the data by
updating the even component:
|
(21) |
where is an update operator.
- The coarse approximation, , becomes the new
data, and the sequence of steps is repeated at the next scale.
The Cohen-Daubechies-Feauveau (CDF) 5/3 biorthogonal wavelets
(Cohen et al., 1992) are constructed by making the prediction operator a
linear interpolation between two neighboring samples,
|
(22) |
and by constructing the update operator to preserve the running
average of the signal (Sweldens and Schröder, 1996), as follows:
|
(23) |
Furthermore, one can create a high-order CDF 9/7 biorthogonal wavelet
transform by using CDF 5/3 biorthogonal wavelets twice with different
lifting operator coefficients (Lian et al., 2001). The transform is
easily inverted according to reversing the steps above:
- Start with the coarsest scale data representation
and the coarsest scale residual .
- Reconstruct the even component by reversing the
operation in equation A-2, as follows:
|
(24) |
- Reconstruct the odd component
by reversing the operation in equation A-1, as follows:
|
(25) |
- Combine the odd and even components to generate the data at
the previous scale level and repeat the sequence of steps.
|
|
|
| Signal and noise separation in prestack seismic data using velocity-dependent seislet transform | |
|
Next: Bibliography
Up: Liu et al.: VD-seislet
Previous: Acknowledgments
2015-10-24