|
|
|
| OC-seislet: seislet transform construction with differential offset continuation | |
|
Next: OC-seislet structure
Up: Theoretical basis
Previous: Theoretical basis
The lifting scheme (Sweldens, 1995) provides a convenient approach
for designing digital wavelet transforms. The general recipe is as
follows:
- Organize the input data as a sequence of records. For
OC-seislet transform of 2-D seismic reflection data, the input
is in the `frequency'-`midpoint wavenumber'-`offset' domain
after the log-stretched NMO correction (Bolondi et al., 1982),
and the transform direction is offset.
- Divide the data records (along the offset axis in the case of the
OC-seislet transform) into even and odd components
and
. This step works at one scale level.
- Find the residual difference
between the odd
component and its prediction from the even component:
|
(1) |
where
is a prediction operator.
For example, one can obtain Cohen-Daubechies-Feauveau (CDF) 5/3
biorthogonal wavelets (Cohen et al., 1992) by defining the
prediction operator as a linear interpolation between two neighboring
samples,
|
(2) |
where
is an index number at the current scale level.
- Find an approximation
of the data by updating
the even component:
|
(3) |
where
is an update operator. Constructing the
update operator for CDF 5/3 biorthogonal wavelets aims at preserving
the running average of the signal
(Sweldens and Schröder, 1996):
|
(4) |
- The coarse approximation
becomes the new data,
and the sequence of steps is repeated on the new data
to calculate the transform coefficients at a coarser scale level.
Next, we define new prediction and update operators using
offset-continuation operators.
|
|
|
| OC-seislet: seislet transform construction with differential offset continuation | |
|
Next: OC-seislet structure
Up: Theoretical basis
Previous: Theoretical basis
2013-07-26